| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5525
   |
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:22:21 -
[1] - Quote
Interesting....
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5526
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:26:13 -
[2] - Quote
DragonHelm III wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Ama Scelesta wrote:RIP ISBoxer? ISBoxer has some great uses outside of it's broadcasting functions. So maybe, but probably not. For god's sake CCP stop all the bluster and give a straight answer ISBOXER banned or not? It just needs a yes or no All this crap about terms like Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing mean squat to me as I have no idea what they are.
For these things, yes it is banned.
Quote:
This includes, but isnGÇÖt limited to:
GÇó Activation and control of ships and modules
GÇó Navigation and movement within the EVE universe
GÇó Movement of assets and items within the EVE universe
GÇó Interaction with other characters
It seemed pretty clear to me.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5526
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:29:09 -
[3] - Quote
Mierin Arthie wrote:How does this policy update regard the usage of KVM switches to control multiple computers from one mouse/keyboard? for those that dont know what a kvm switch is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVM_switch
That doesn't broadcast, it just changes where input goes - it should be fine.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5528
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:36:39 -
[4] - Quote
Querns wrote:Cue several dozen pages of people trying to invent increasingly complex vignettes that attempt to subvert the letter of the decision to legitimize actions that violate its spirit.
"But what if I set it up to delay my "broadcasts" by a random few milliseconds, so it looks like I'm pushing buttans on 32 computers in a row really fast... is that ok?"
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5532
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:22:46 -
[5] - Quote
Jean Luc Lemmont wrote:Mierin Arthie wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:We would like to clarify that it does not matter how Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing are being done, whether through use of software or modified hardware. Our only concern is regarding how it is being used in the EVE universe. How does this policy update regard the usage of KVM switches to control multiple computers from one mouse/keyboard? for those that dont know what a kvm switch is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVM_switch That would be keyboard multiplexing. The definitions in the OP are pretty clear.
No, KVM switch is just that - a switch. It connects you to one computer at a time, not multiple.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5533
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:55:16 -
[6] - Quote
Hopelesshobo wrote:So, because broadcasting is being banned as of 01 Jan 2015, does that mean on 01 Jan 2015, cloaks will be reverted again to not decloaking each other while cloaked since the main reason this was changed back was to nerf broadcasting bombers together?
Keep up with the times... they already changed their minds on that one before even implementing it. Nothing to revert.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5536
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:05:29 -
[7] - Quote
Airi Cho wrote:PL really has a thing for Taylor Swift it seems :p
It was a play off his Miley Cyrus example - did you miss that? I don't particularly care for either one.
And my corp name is a play off of PL, I don't particularly have any affiliation with them.
So you might be right, and you might be wrong, but my post doesn't connect the dots.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5536
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:16:24 -
[8] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:War Kitten wrote:Hopelesshobo wrote:So, because broadcasting is being banned as of 01 Jan 2015, does that mean on 01 Jan 2015, cloaks will be reverted again to not decloaking each other while cloaked since the main reason this was changed back was to nerf broadcasting bombers together? Keep up with the times... they already changed their minds on that one before even implementing it. Nothing to revert. Hey! Thanks for that, I missed it. So the decloak other cloaked ships thing is not going to be implemented eh? Excellent. I much prefer this solution.
No problem... here's CCP Fozzie's post on the topic: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5159156#post5159156
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5536
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:29:49 -
[9] - Quote
Taram Caldar wrote:War Kitten wrote:Mierin Arthie wrote:How does this policy update regard the usage of KVM switches to control multiple computers from one mouse/keyboard? for those that dont know what a kvm switch is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVM_switch That doesn't broadcast, it just changes where input goes - it should be fine. Wrong it broadcasts a single command to multiple systems Still applies. Seriously people.... reading comprehension
No, that's not what a KVM switch does. It is a switch that allows you to select which system to send input to. It's 1:1.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|
| |
|